How about fitting a nice leaper to your XJS?

Moderators:davidr, BigCatXJS, dhdove

User avatar
GlennH
Posts:120
Joined:Tue Nov 15, 2005 11:24 pm
Location:March, Cambridgeshire
How about fitting a nice leaper to your XJS?

Postby GlennH » Mon Apr 10, 2006 10:47 pm

I spotted this little beauty at a local car lot. I couldn't resist posting a couple of photos here. :twisted:

I am not a huge fan of leapers on the noble prow of the XJS, but this one has to be the worst installation I've ever seen.

I can't for one moment think this was owned by a fellow JEC member, but just in case this was once your pride and joy and you are embarrassed by my gentle mockery, I apologise, but what on earth possessed you to do this to your poor car???!!!
If you had to use a leaper paperweight, you could have at least taken it off its base. :shock:

Click on the photos for full size versions if you dare...

http://homepages.nildram.co.uk/~holmeng ... 002thm.JPG

And the mascot in it's full 'glory'

http://homepages.nildram.co.uk/~holmeng ... 003thm.JPG

Any takers for this little gem? I can put you in touch with the dealer for a small consideration. :wink:
Glenn.
1989 XJR-S 6.0.
2001 X-Type 3.0 Sport.
Both in British Racing Green.

User avatar
Jon
Posts:108
Joined:Sun Sep 18, 2005 6:07 pm
Location:Under the Jag.

Postby Jon » Tue Apr 11, 2006 5:17 pm

:shock: I bet that takes about 10mph off the top speed :roll:
CLEAN old '87 XJ-S 3.6 manual (for sale!)
If no-one buys it soon, its going on classic insurance!
'96 XJR manual (the green monster)

veniceinperil
Posts:14
Joined:Sat Mar 04, 2006 12:38 pm

Postby veniceinperil » Tue Apr 11, 2006 8:44 pm

I bet it takes about four grand off the asking price... :(

poprivet

Member
Posts:1985
Joined:Mon Jan 16, 2006 3:20 pm
Location:Hampshire
Contact:

Postby poprivet » Wed Apr 12, 2006 1:30 pm

OMG! Please don't tell me he drilled the bonnet to fit it :cry:
Pop

User avatar
JulesJag
Posts:42
Joined:Sat Sep 10, 2005 9:32 pm
Location:Brighton & Hove, Sussex
Contact:

Postby JulesJag » Wed Apr 12, 2006 3:47 pm

Is it a leaper paperweight ?

Julian
1990(H) XJ-S 3.6 auto

veniceinperil
Posts:14
Joined:Sat Mar 04, 2006 12:38 pm

Postby veniceinperil » Wed Apr 12, 2006 3:59 pm

I wonder if he'd intended to dash mount it and after a night at the pub lost all perspective of the length of his car..

Or maybe the previous day, a passing seagull having been out for a curry the night before,left the very worst of deposits right on the spot marked by the offending item....

Which brings us back to the dealer...Anyone got a deposit for me :lol: xjs....

User avatar
Mark_B
Posts:199
Joined:Wed Sep 07, 2005 7:05 pm
Location:Luton
Contact:

Postby Mark_B » Wed Apr 12, 2006 9:46 pm

Yuck! Leapers on the Sports Jags look stupid in my eyes. Leave them on the Salooons. :-)
XJ-S 3.6 230k miles +

User avatar
GlennH
Posts:120
Joined:Tue Nov 15, 2005 11:24 pm
Location:March, Cambridgeshire

Postby GlennH » Thu Apr 13, 2006 6:56 pm

No takers for this car yet? I am surprised...

It does have one more endearing trait. Both headlamps fill with water from time to time, so it's clearly not a happy motor... :lol:

My guess is it really is a paperweight (I'm sure I've seen one in a display cabinet at the main dealer in Peterborough) and since it hasn't washed off in all the rain we've had recently, my money's on it being bolted to the bonnet.

Regards,
Glenn.
Glenn.
1989 XJR-S 6.0.
2001 X-Type 3.0 Sport.
Both in British Racing Green.

SimonR

Member
Posts:578
Joined:Mon Jan 05, 2009 1:55 pm

Postby SimonR » Tue Apr 18, 2006 8:30 pm

Ill probably get flamed alive here..., i'm also not a fan of the twin-headlamp conversions.... BLEARGHHH

Someone escort this gentleman to the door, please ;-)

Seriously though, I don't think that there's a more contentious XJ-S-related subject! I guess the twin lights are a bit like Marmite in that either you love them or hate them. Personally I think they look superb but I know that there are lots of people who disagree.

I converted my car a couple of months ago from solids to twins but kept the originals, just in case I ever change my mind.

One thing's for sure though, the twins are a lot brighter and people tend to get out of your way if you leave them on full beam without realising it and then drive up behind them...!

User avatar
GlennH
Posts:120
Joined:Tue Nov 15, 2005 11:24 pm
Location:March, Cambridgeshire

Postby GlennH » Tue Apr 18, 2006 11:04 pm

One thing's for sure though, the twins are a lot brighter and people tend to get out of your way if you leave them on full beam without realising it and then drive up behind them...!
Hooligan!

I can't condone such sneaky behaviour, but I've seen first hand how effective it is :twisted:

I too prefer the look of the ovals on my car, but the twins (UK spec not those feeble USA units) are undeniably brighter, I know which I'd rather have fitted for night driving. Another bonus of having them on your own car is that from behind the wheel, you can't see them. :wink:
Glenn.
1989 XJR-S 6.0.
2001 X-Type 3.0 Sport.
Both in British Racing Green.

User avatar
Jon
Posts:108
Joined:Sun Sep 18, 2005 6:07 pm
Location:Under the Jag.

Postby Jon » Wed Apr 19, 2006 9:40 am

I don't know simon, you'll be telling us you've got knight rider lights fitted next! :lol:

I'm not sure about the twin lamps, I suppose I wouldn't mind a pair to try and see what they look like, but they always seem to go for a lot more than 'experiment' money. :wink:
CLEAN old '87 XJ-S 3.6 manual (for sale!)
If no-one buys it soon, its going on classic insurance!
'96 XJR manual (the green monster)

SimonR

Member
Posts:578
Joined:Mon Jan 05, 2009 1:55 pm

Postby SimonR » Wed Apr 19, 2006 3:15 pm

I don't know simon, you'll be telling us you've got knight rider lights fitted next!

Actually I probably should just clarify: I'm not in the habit of driving around with my full beams on! It's just that I find that having dipped headlights on during the day enables those people who drive at 62.5 miles an hour in lane three of a motorway to see me in their rear view mirror and get the hell out of my way! I only turn it on when people act like I'm invisible...

There's nothing more annoying than having all that glorious power under your right foot and not being able to use it because there's some idiot in a tinpot jaloppy in your way, is there?!

Actually, the light situation is compounted by the fact that my dash indicator for full beam is very dull and I can't see it in day light, so it's a bit of a lottery as to whether my lights are dipped or full most of the time...

poprivet

Member
Posts:1985
Joined:Mon Jan 16, 2006 3:20 pm
Location:Hampshire
Contact:

Postby poprivet » Wed Apr 19, 2006 5:19 pm

I prefer the look of the ovals, but if replacements ever become impossible to find I would gladly install twins to keep the xj-s going.
Pop

apax
Posts:23
Joined:Tue Sep 29, 2009 1:26 pm

Postby apax » Thu Apr 20, 2006 12:47 am

OK, We all know that this is 'In the eye of the beholder' territory, but in the eyes of this beholder, the ovals were a design flaw. I don't want my car to have a blank, bug eyed look so I've gone for the extra power and purposeful look of the twin setup. Not cheap and not a purist approach but I just know I've done the right thing, I think. :roll: My ovals are also still in the garage, just in case......Cheers, Archie.

User avatar
ng4xjs

Member
Posts:477
Joined:Thu Jul 29, 2010 12:49 pm

Postby ng4xjs » Thu Apr 20, 2006 12:36 pm

I am afraid I hate the thought of having to convert mine to the twin set up. Unfortunately I drive a “Facelift” and the likely hood is that if anything nasty happens to the ones I’ve got, that this may then be my only practical option. I rue the day.

Nick

ps. I reckon also it is a paper weight.
1994 4.0 XJS AJ16 BRG
2009 2.2 X Type Diesel BRG
2007 4.2 X150 Silver


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests