Posting Images
Posted: Fri Apr 02, 2010 5:49 pm
I`ve had success previously posting images on my Forum gallery using a fast image resizer to reduce what I assume is pixel density.
Could someone answer this question please?
My digital camera has "M" settings from 10 down to 1 and some sort of pixel volume guide which as far as I can understand it, implies a reduction in pixelation the lower the setting goes. Presumably 10 would equate to 10mega pixel definition, 3 to 3mega pixel etc etc. Picture quality degrades as the figure lowers. When set to level 1M on the camera, the shown pixel sizes appear to be similar to the requirement of our Galleries. Am I correct in my assumption.
Taking things further, would it be better for gallery pictures taken on my camera to be originated on the 1M setting, thus avoiding the need to use the resizer on my computor?
Any advice appreciated.
As a norm, I set the camera to 3M which produces pictures of around 3oo-8ookb. Typically I use that size for sending on e-mail, as quality is quite reasonable and uploading times are tolerable. It is also the size that I`ve been sending Nigel for his inclusion with copy script for the S-type Forum pages. Some pictures however do fall apart slightly if Nigel edits and expands them further. The situation gets worse if I`ve already edited the original pics, prior to sending them to him.
This IT stuff is a huge learning curve on occasions.
Cheers Boys. Nice BB your have going. Trying to get mine to the same volume and quality. Thanks for letting me chip in.
Mike Kennedy. S-type Coordinator.
Could someone answer this question please?
My digital camera has "M" settings from 10 down to 1 and some sort of pixel volume guide which as far as I can understand it, implies a reduction in pixelation the lower the setting goes. Presumably 10 would equate to 10mega pixel definition, 3 to 3mega pixel etc etc. Picture quality degrades as the figure lowers. When set to level 1M on the camera, the shown pixel sizes appear to be similar to the requirement of our Galleries. Am I correct in my assumption.
Taking things further, would it be better for gallery pictures taken on my camera to be originated on the 1M setting, thus avoiding the need to use the resizer on my computor?
Any advice appreciated.
As a norm, I set the camera to 3M which produces pictures of around 3oo-8ookb. Typically I use that size for sending on e-mail, as quality is quite reasonable and uploading times are tolerable. It is also the size that I`ve been sending Nigel for his inclusion with copy script for the S-type Forum pages. Some pictures however do fall apart slightly if Nigel edits and expands them further. The situation gets worse if I`ve already edited the original pics, prior to sending them to him.
This IT stuff is a huge learning curve on occasions.
Cheers Boys. Nice BB your have going. Trying to get mine to the same volume and quality. Thanks for letting me chip in.
Mike Kennedy. S-type Coordinator.