Vented or unvented fuel filler cap?

Moderators:iRS, Art1012

justin131

Member
Posts:2
Joined:Wed Mar 16, 2022 1:40 pm
Vented or unvented fuel filler cap?

Postby justin131 » Wed Aug 24, 2022 12:30 pm

Hi,

I'm a recent owner of a UK registered 1964 3.8 etype FHC on 38,000 miles (not wholly substantiated). I wondered if I should be using a vented or un-vented fuel cap. Looking through the service history of the car, there has been a petrol smell issue for many years.

There was also a strong fume smell which I resolved by connecting the engine breather pipe to the carb back plate!! I'm getting a lot of smoke from the engine breather but no blue smoke from the exhaust. What's the likely cause of this - I'm guessing valve guides??

Many thanks,

Justin.

User avatar
iRS

Moderator
Posts:226
Joined:Fri Apr 01, 2016 3:24 pm
Location:Aberdeenshire
Contact:

Re: Vented or unvented fuel filler cap?

Postby iRS » Mon Aug 29, 2022 10:25 am

Hi Justin,
I'm pretty sure the tank should be vented. I've had a look at my fuel cap and I can see a vent hole.
As for the crankcase, then I would suspect rings - though I think these engines normally wear guides sooner than rings. Also its not uncommon for them to have a slightly smokey exhaust, so atc least yours is good there. I would suggest a leak down test.
Hope this helps.
Roger S
Aberdeenshire
E-TYPE MODEL SECTION COORDINATOR

Early E
1976 XJ-S - original factory manual. Currently in many pieces.
X350 - 2005 Super V8
1962 MGB

justin131

Member
Posts:2
Joined:Wed Mar 16, 2022 1:40 pm

Re: Vented or unvented fuel filler cap?

Postby justin131 » Wed Oct 19, 2022 4:29 pm

That's great - thanks.


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests