Page 1 of 1

XJ40 - break or preserve?

Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2016 9:39 am
by ChrisDixon
Some will say this isn't a dilemma and you should never break a good car. Others are less sentimental. I have a '91 3.2 manual which is fundamentally sound, has done only 55K miles and only needed a rack gaiter and a couple of shock bushes for its MoT. But because its a manual the gearbox alone accounts for at least half the value of the car, and it has been suggested that I break it and sell off the other useful bits, keeping the gearbox for a future XJS V12 conversion project. Up to now I've literally steered away from this by driving the car to remind myself how good it is, but I am coming up against the old chestnut of space constraints. What do you think?

PS - If anyone is interested I know of 2 other XJ40s in Kent that are potential breakers. They are both Sovs (3.6s I think) but one has a cloth interior strangely.

Re: XJ40 - break or preserve?

Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2016 5:08 pm
by robv12
rare car, preserve, easy

Re: XJ40 - break or preserve?

Posted: Wed Sep 07, 2016 12:11 pm
by naki
Chris.

Most of the manuals are already gone, simple to take the gearboxes.
i have tried to save as many as i can. Space is a valuable commodity though.


"its worth more in parts". i hear this statement quoted very often, and it is the case for many 40s/ 300s, not just the manuals.
Its no small deal to properly break a car though. The time and space required to carry it out is significant. Plus then storing all the parts? The space one whole car takes up, then times that by 2 for how much space all the parts take up (if you keep them).

End of the day its your car to do with what you please. But if the body is sound and rot free, sense will say it should be saved. Most of the manuals had a very hard life getting hammered to death. so to find one that has not, it a rare thing indeed.

Re: XJ40 - break or preserve?

Posted: Thu Sep 08, 2016 8:38 am
by ChrisDixon
Hi Naki, this one definitely hasn't been hammered, it was owned long term by an old boy. So mechanically and structurally its all there, just needed a few things fixing (which you kindly helped supply some of the bits for) and a few cosmetics.

Re: XJ40 - break or preserve?

Posted: Sat Sep 10, 2016 3:09 pm
by naki
Hi Naki, this one definitely hasn't been hammered, it was owned long term by an old boy. So mechanically and structurally its all there, just needed a few things fixing (which you kindly helped supply some of the bits for) and a few cosmetics.
yep, they pretty much all need work now, even low mileage relatively good cars. so business as usual. you just have to have the time and inclination to do it.

you could sell it on if you have lost interest of course.

Re: XJ40 - break or preserve?

Posted: Fri Sep 16, 2016 7:53 pm
by db40
I would say this car is definitely worthy of being preserved. :)

Re: XJ40 - break or preserve?

Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2016 8:18 am
by ChrisDixon
I am inclined to agree that the car should be kept intact. My dilemma is that I bought 2 cars at around the same time, the other being an even rarer X300 XJR manual. I think I know which one you'll suggest I keep if I didn't have room for both!

Re: XJ40 - break or preserve?

Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2016 11:45 pm
by naki
You could still sell it complete.
How about sticking some pics up.

Re: XJ40 - break or preserve?

Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2016 11:45 pm
by naki
You could still sell it complete.
How about sticking some pics up.

Re: XJ40 - break or preserve?

Posted: Tue Sep 20, 2016 6:21 pm
by ChrisDixon
Some pics ......
20160529_120348.jpg
20160529_121806.jpg
It had new chrome and lights following a minor senior prang apparently
20160529_124814.jpg

Re: XJ40 - break or preserve?

Posted: Tue Sep 20, 2016 6:26 pm
by ChrisDixon
And a couple more:

The cloth interior, a change from the usual expanse of leather!
20160529_121824.jpg
ABS and a catalyst but no aircon, or sunroof, but all the electric windows work fine
20160529_122405.jpg

Re: XJ40 - break or preserve?

Posted: Wed Sep 21, 2016 5:20 pm
by naki
Looks decent as you would expect at this mileage.
I think it's worth advertising, to see if there is any interest.

Re: XJ40 - break or preserve?

Posted: Wed Sep 21, 2016 6:48 pm
by PeterDavisX300
That's a nice car. If the 'Gal' would let me I'd add it to my wee collection. But with a Big-Ford, and another older Jaguar, plus a few Motorcycles...............I think her saying would be, "Aye, that'll be 'shiney-bright'. :D

Re: XJ40 - break or preserve?

Posted: Thu Sep 22, 2016 8:44 am
by ChrisDixon
Looks decent as you would expect at this mileage.
I think it's worth advertising, to see if there is any interest.
I thought about it, I did try it at £2K back in the spring but when you can get a good auto for less then maybe that was too much. Trouble is once you get under £1500 you feel you are giving it away and because of the manual box the parts argument rears its head again. I should find a barn and wait a few years I suppose. And do the same with some of my other "future classic" vehicles!