I see references to using Metalastic radius arm bushes.
What's the issue here and what's the difference between them and 'after market' ones - apart from the price of course!
Does anyone have any experience or views please?
Cheers, Mac.
IRS Radius arm bushes. Metalastic or not? Part C23782
Moderators:Aceman, ecosselynx
Mac Booker
Current vehicles: 1969 Daimler 420 auto. 2015 Jaguar XE 340 S auto.
Previous outings: 1966 MKII 3.4 auto. 1966 3.8 S Type auto. 2002 XKR convertible.
Current vehicles: 1969 Daimler 420 auto. 2015 Jaguar XE 340 S auto.
Previous outings: 1966 MKII 3.4 auto. 1966 3.8 S Type auto. 2002 XKR convertible.
-
ChrisDixon
- Posts:330
- Joined:Wed Oct 10, 2007 1:51 pm
- Location:Kent
Re: IRS Radius arm bushes. Metalastic or not? Part C23782
Metalastic is the trademark of the company that invented bushes that have rubber between the outer and inner metal tubes. If you search the name you can find an interesting history of the company. If you want to keep the car more or less standard the main parts suppliers like SNG all sell them to OEM spec (or they may even still be Jag supplied), so unless you want and can find polybush replacements stick with them.
Re: IRS Radius arm bushes. Metalastic or not? Part C23782
Thanks Chris.
Mac Booker
Current vehicles: 1969 Daimler 420 auto. 2015 Jaguar XE 340 S auto.
Previous outings: 1966 MKII 3.4 auto. 1966 3.8 S Type auto. 2002 XKR convertible.
Current vehicles: 1969 Daimler 420 auto. 2015 Jaguar XE 340 S auto.
Previous outings: 1966 MKII 3.4 auto. 1966 3.8 S Type auto. 2002 XKR convertible.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest
